Proposed Reaver and AA Changes

[Rapidstrike]

Jesus, what the hell do I need the striker for now?

[Valkyrie]

The Devs are doing a Star Wars Galaxy's to the Game it is unavoidable

[HeavyArmsCustum]

Well, i just read it, and i will say i like one thing: Being able to aim higher with my Burster. I've been wanying this since....yeah, since. Will help with libs.
I still want to lock down and reload at the same time. Period. End of story and debate.

[betasoldier]

But Heavy, that won't help as much as it seems people think it will help.It isn't so much the height thing as it's the fact that it will still take a skilled person to kill or even damage a lib at high altitude.They're doing it to just get people to shut up about it for a while.

[HeavyArmsCustum]

.It isn't so much the height thing as it's the fact that it will still take a skilled person to kill or even damage a lib at high altitude.

<----
Nuff said. Trust me, i've been wanting a little more tilt forever and any little amount WILL help. Is it what it needs? No. But it helps me

[jediknight]

With the reavers new agility plus faster rockets/more AV damage say goodbye to a shitload of burster users....

[BigBossMonkey]

Just when I was thinking about getting a max too. Meh, oh well.

[betasoldier]

There's not enough now to leave that would account for a shitload of burster users.

[jediknight]

True Dat Homez

[Outbound]

Good maybe we'll be able to get better support from the air corps now, nothing frosts my monkey more than to be getting hammered by armor and see reavers fly over, ignore the armor and spam a hill top to get the easy infantry kills.

Yeah, I know the feeling. When I fly a reaver I almost always go immediately for any ground vehicles, because I go for Points over Kills in general. Not only is it more useful over all, it gets me what I want (if I get the kill), the big EXP. So I see this as a major buff, 1.33x the damage! AA killing faster will only end up equaling out to the previous going out of control. So yeah, I'm OK with it.